We have been taught that feints are a powerful tool in a fighter’s toolbox that allow us to create openings in our opponents’ defense through which we can attack. In truth, feints can be highly effective at doing that, which is why the masters gave us feints to use. Here is an excellent example: “The Veler: All fighters who rely on displacing are deceived and defeated with the Veler. When you close with him, feint any Oberhau to his left side. From there, when he wants to displace it, you can easily hit another opening.” (Ringeck fol. 29v.) Von Danzig is even more explicit about the Veler, saying: “The Veler is a piece which can be used against many fighters who rely on fighting to the sword and not to the openings.” (Von Danzig fol. 22r.)
What is true for a common fighter, however, is not necessarily true for a student of Master Liechtenauer’s art, and that is certainly the case with feints. In actuality, no feint should ever work on a fighter who understands and applies Master Liechtenauer’s art correctly. Let’s examine why that is so.
Continue reading on “The Schol of Battle”
